|
|
|
|
This website is a work in progress and there is a lot more 'history' still to add and that will be done as time allows.
1928 This was the year 'The Bungalow' was built. A Transfer of Legal Charge attached to the property's deeds states the following: THE SCHEDULE 2.
A piece of land with bungalow in course of construction thron situate in
Lydden afsd being the premises firstly convd to the Testator by Deed dated 13th
August 1925 and made between Henry Gray (1) and the Testator (2) DULY
EXECUTED by the Borrowers and the parties thrto TRANSFER of Legal Charge of this date (endorsed on before abstd Legal Charge) between within-named Ernest Edward Pain
1958 The following is an extract from a Conveyance of the ‘The Bungalow’ to Reginald Alfred Gibbs. This Conveyance is
made the ………. Day of……….. One thousand nine hundred and fifty-eight BETWEEN
IVAN CLEMENT PEARCE of 43 St Michael’s Street, Folkestone in the County
of Kent, Company Secretary and Director (hereinafter called “the vendor”) of
the one part and REGINALD ALFRED GIBBS of 57 Tankerton Terrace, Mitcham
Road, Croydon in the County of Surrey (hereinafter called “the purchaser”)
of the other part. NOW THIS DEED WITNESSETH in pursuance of the said agreement … …..the Vendor as beneficial owner hereby conveys unto the Purchaser ALL THAT piece or parcel of land with the bungalow erected upon part thereof lying and being on the south side of the road leading from Lydden to Alkham in the parish of Lydden in the County of Kent …………………………………
1965 The Bungalow was purchased by Miss Dickinson.
15 June 1984 I purchased ‘The Bungalow’ from Miss Dickinson.
9 August 1984 (just 7 weeks later!), The Planning Committee voted to demolish my bungalow. The decision was made based solely on false information presented by the paid officials and without considering any representation from me. 1985 31
July 1989 27
February 1990 28 February 2005 This application was to regularise the mobile home but the title of the application was altered three times by the Council without any consultation with me. These changes completely altered the nature of my intended application and was a clear attempt to try and wipe out the existing lawful ‘use of the land' which would have happened following the inevitable refusal. This would have largely covered DDC’s illegal activities and their conspiracy to defraud. 29 August
2005 June 2007
|